By: Sean Cotnam
Copy edited by Amanda Hirsch and Will Dong
Research Edited by: Jared Bernhardt
Format edited by: Arthur Carlton-Jones
One of the biggest problems in today’s society is the lack of nourishment for the less fortunate. In fact, over 795 million people in the world do not have access to enough nutritious food to live a healthy life.  Theoretically speaking, we would have the ability to end world hunger if a proper allocation of money and resources were dedicated to areas that struggle and need it the most.
People that deny our capabilities of ending world hunger generally believe our world is a dystopian society where each individual person is solely set on helping themselves. They also use an argument that focuses on logos; they argue that it is impractical to satisfy a hunger free world.
Those who believe we can end world hunger are generally people that believe in the good nature of people and the strong will of government regulations and restrictions.
So, who is right? Are we able to end world hunger? At what cost?
We Cannot End World Hunger
Some believe that we cannot end world hunger because that would require worldwide cooperation. There is a strong belief that in order to end world hunger we must dedicate a budget and, more importantly, change our dietary habits. The majority of Americans live for dairy and meat products. These common commodities will become delicacies in our world if we decide to end world hunger. This is because as food goes up in the food pyramid it loses 90% of its energy to heat. So animals like chickens and cows are much less efficient than vegetables. Most people generally believe that changing their diets to end world hunger is the right thing to do. Yet, in this situation, what people believe in is completely different compared to their actions.
We Can End World Hunger
Others believe that if we live a life of ethical reasoning, then we can easily end world hunger. The factors playing into ending world hunger vary in terms of how easy they are to accomplish. Money is not an issue; it only costs $30 billion dollars a year to end world hunger. Even though this seems like a lot of money, the reality is that if you tax the wealthy families heavily within nations that are better off, we can easily acquire thirty billion dollars. It also becomes complicated when you factor in dietary changes that need to happen. We produce enough food to feed 10 billion people. The problem here is the distribution of the food and who has the rights to the food. However, this can be solved if the United Nations holds a convention that requires powerful countries to plan their food economy around ending world hunger.
Thoughts of a College Student
Personally, I believe that we can end world hunger with just a few changes in our society. First off, I believe that these changes must initially come from a global scale and then find its way down to the people. If we invest in a world that focuses on making sure everyone is fed, then we can be successful. The government must create laws and initiatives that promote healthy eating because someone is not going to go from eating a cheeseburger to a salad every night by just telling them. Lastly, it must come from the people. Some can say they have the right to eat whatever they want, but at what cost does that come with? Is a cheeseburger worth prolonging world hunger? If the average person puts down their cheeseburger and picks up more vegetables, then we will end world hunger.