Should Parents Give Their Children the MMR Vaccine?


By: Lizbeth Yorio

Copy edited by: Anna Salomon Pasapera and Kevin Qiao

Research edited by: Stefon Wynter

Format edited by: Arthur Carlton-Jones

The issue with children and vaccinations is not a relatively new one. Apparent even during the time of Benjamin Franklin, the matter continues to plague our society today.[1] One vaccine, in particular, that has caused much heated debate is the MMR, or measles-mumps-rubella, vaccine. As now a requirement in all 50 states to attend public school, parents have to wonder if the vaccine is all that beneficial. [2]

What’s So Great About MMR?

Supporters of the MMR vaccine argue that it is wholly valuable not only to the child, but to society as well. In accordance with the beliefs of the CDC, they hold that the vaccination is the best way to prevent measles, mumps, and rubella. [3] One dose of MMR is 93% effective, while two doses are 97% effective for prevention. [4] In having these hard statistics, supporters maintain that the MMR vaccine is the best way in preventing the spread of measles, mumps, and rubella. They also believe in a concept known as “herd immunity”. With this idea, a community, in which the majority is vaccinated, helps prevent the spread of disease to people who are unvaccinated. [5] So, children having received the MMR vaccine, could ultimately help increase the wellbeing of the community. In accordance with the theory, children receiving the vaccination benefit themselves and the other children around them. Another factor in the supporter’s case to vaccinate, is the weak link to dangerous side effects. A study conducted by Dr. Andrew Wakefield in 1998 confirmed a link between the vaccine, autism, and Crohn’s disease. [6] This study, however, was retracted and discredited. As a result of this, many pro-vaccinators reasoned that since there is no conclusive and convincing evidence tying MMR to Crohn’s disease or autism, the vaccination is safe. They continue to hold that parents give their children the vaccination. The benefits, in their eyes, outweigh the risks.

It Can’t Be All That Good

The opposing side asserts that children should not be given the vaccination, for it is thoroughly detrimental to the child. Although Wakefield’s study was rejected, some studies have linked MMR to autism, and Crohn’s disease. [7] It is through these findings that parents are still hesitant about giving their children the vaccine. Dr. William Thompson of the CDC claims that the CDC lied about the link of MMR to autism. [8] According to him, they withheld crucial evidence connecting the two together. It is with this finding that opponents of MMR feel that the vaccination is not safe enough to be issued to children. The anti-vaccination group also contests the effectiveness of the vaccine. In 2010, a lawsuit was filed against Merck, manufacturers of MMR, because they submitted false data to the FDA about the efficacy of the vaccine. [9] The case is still ongoing, and in 2012, two other lawsuits were filed against Merck. [9] Among the uncertainties associated with MMR, it isn’t hard to see why there is opposition in giving it to children. There also exists evidence that MMR has actually helped spread epidemics, not prevented them. In Neil Miller’s book Vaccines: Are They Safe and Effective?, he notes that in the outbreak of measles, 63% of the infected had already been vaccinated. [10] Thus, the MMR vaccine proves not to be as effective as claimed by the CDC, and the FDA.

In Conclusion

All in all, I believe that parents should give their children the MMR vaccine. It has been used for many years, worldwide, without any significant damages to society. Despite supposed links to autism, and Crohn’s disease, the risk of disease, I feel, is greater than the risk of the side effects. As a member of society, I believe it is my duty to ensure the wellbeing of my community. I wouldn’t want another child to get sick from my negligence to vaccinate my own. The MMR vaccine is put into place to protect us, not to hurt us.


Divorce’s Effect on Children

By: Brian Garchitorena

Copy edited by: Amanda Hirsch and Stefon Wynter

Research edited by: Jared Bernhardt

Format edited by: Arthur Carlton-Jones

I hope they will work it out.

Almost half of all marriages in the United States end in divorce. Most parents want to know how their children will be affected if they get divorced; they are not alone. There are endless possible effects on a child’s development such as psychological distress and emotional scars that can last into adulthood. What many of these children are unaware of is how greatly these traumatic effects will impact their own marriage later on in life. It has been largely debated whether or not children of divorce are more likely to get divorced themselves. If you are thinking about getting divorced, it will have a huge impact on your child’s development.

Divorce is almost always a difficult time for all parties involved, especially the children. They know first-hand how rough life can be for a family suffering this fate. It tears families apart and forever leaves the children wishing for everything to go back to normal. Divorce can be terribly traumatic for kids; enough so that they may never want to put anyone else through the same suffering. Divorce does not only make children have more empathy, and it was also discovered that it makes them more independent. A study done in 1974 by two social workers stated that “divorce could ‘liberate children’ by making them less dependent on their parents.”[1] It allows children to grow up quicker and discover who they are.  

If the children have been part of a divorce, they will be more prepared and less anxious to get a divorce as an adult. People react differently to divorce, but generally humans are creatures of habit. They stick to what they are familiar with. Children only have one childhood; in their minds, divorce is part of growing up. Being a child when your parents are going through a divorce can cause you to remember that time as a familiarity. Generally, there is a sense of nostalgia that people have about their childhood, so if a parent’s divorce takes place during their kid’s childhood, their kid is more likely to be misattribute their positive feeling to divorce making it seem more acceptable to them. People tend to be far more scared of the anticipation of things than they are of the things themselves. The same concept applies to divorce.

Bottom Line

I believe children of divorce are more open to getting divorced. As one of those children, I am telling you that your marriage and divorce attributes greatly to your children’s perception of what a relationship is like. A 36 year old woman named Janet whose parents divorced when she was ten said, “I never had an example of how to be successfully married,’ she says. ‘All I had was an example of how to be successfully single.” It is much more difficult for children of divorce to stay married when their sole example was unable to. We take after our parents; if they get divorced, we know nothing else. You should teach your children that “divorce is not inevitable, it is a result of human error.”[2]

There is an overwhelmingly negative stigma about divorce, but it’s actually a positive alternative. Divorce has harmful effects on your children, but it’s a remarkable improvement over raising a child in a toxic environment. “Many experts contend that many couples in troubled marriages should divorce rather than raise children in a household permeated with anger and tension.”[3] If the only reason you’re staying together is for the kids, don’t stay together. It could do more harm than good.